Your research cold emails suck. Dossier solves that: 36% response rate vs. 4% average.
"If you know the enemy and know yourself,
you need not fear 100 battles."SUN TZU, THE ART OF WAR
SEE AN EXAMPLE
INTERNAL STUDY · n=50
We cold emailed fifty Harvard and Stanford professors.
Here is what we found.
36%
RESPONSE RATE
vs. 4% industry average
8%
MENTOR RATE
vs. 0.5% average
r=0.91
CORRELATION
personalization to response rate
EXAMPLE OUTPUT
We gave Dossiér a high school student and a Stanford neuroscience professor. Here is exactly what came back.
Associate Professor of Neurobiology and, by courtesy, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine (Stanford, California, United States)
Huberman's HEXACO and DISC profiles are grounded in a consistent behavioral pattern across multiple independent sources.
Open with
A specific, genuinely-read detail from one of his actual peer-reviewed papers (the 2023 respiration study or his retinal regeneration work), signaling you engaged with the science and not the podcast persona.
Lead with
vision
Pace
fast/high-level
Never
Frame him only as a podcaster or supplement guy. He has faced public criticism on exactly that point and identifies strongly as a rigorous Stanford scientist. Reducing him to the brand will end the conversation fast.
Lead with the Cell Reports Medicine breathwork paper, not the podcast.
Frame your interest around an open question, not a conclusion.
Do not mention the podcast as your primary entry point.
Connect your interest to patient or population impact.
Keep the initial ask small and time-bounded.
Huberman is a tenured Stanford neuroscientist whose career traces a clear arc from basic vision science to translational neuroscience to mass public communication, and the throughline at every stage is a belief that understanding brain mechanisms has direct practical value for human life. He built a serious academic record before building a media empire, which distinguishes him from most science communicators and is central to how he is received.
Huberman maintains an unusually dense public presence for an active academic. His primary channels are the Huberman Lab podcast (hubermanlab.com), YouTube, the Huberman Lab Substack (59,000+ subscribers, described as "Professor of Neurobiology and Ophthalmology at Stanford School of Medicine and Host of the Huberman Lab podcast"), and active social media including X (@hubermanlab). His Stanford lab website (hubermanlab.stanford.edu) publishes peer-reviewed publications and lab updates. His personal site (hubermanlab.com) hosts the podcast, a Daily Blueprint protocol document, and a searchable content library organized by topic (sleep, neuroplasticity, stress, ADHD, cold exposure, fitness, light and circadian rhythm).
His communication style in public content is characteristically long-form, detailed, and mechanistic. He explains neuroscience by anchoring it to specific circuits, neurotransmitters, and behavioral outcomes rather than metaphors. He is explicit about the distinction between what his lab's research shows versus what the broader literature supports. In a Knowledge Project interview, he framed small behavioral changes as the operative unit of health improvement: "Most things that prolong your wellbeing and that build solid structures of success into your life are about what you can do on a daily basis, not what you can pull off just once or twice." (Source 13)
He has spoken publicly about his shifting motivations over his career, stating: "When I started in science I was just fascinated by the retina and by vision... Over the years... I've been placed in close contact with people who are suffering from vision loss." (Source 12) This signals a trajectory from curiosity-driven to impact-driven motivation.
He hosted a four-hour interview with NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya (Source 18), suggesting willingness to engage with science policy debates and comfort with long-form institutional conversations.
Interpretive analysis, not confirmed fact. Each call is linked to its evidence.
Huberman's career arc reveals a scientist who resolved the tension between academic rigor and public impact by pursuing both simultaneously rather than choosing between them. His deepest operating principle appears to be that scientific knowledge has no value if it stays inside the lab, and his most consistent behavioral signal is that he reserves his real engagement for people who meet him at the level of mechanisms, not summaries.
Sources used: 22 sources clearly about this person (LinkedIn anchor profile, Stanford lab site, Stanford Medicine profile, hubermanlab.com About page, Stanford Magazine, Glaucoma Research Foundation interview, Knowledge Project podcast transcript, The Proof podcast transcript, Rich Roll podcast transcript, Huberman Lab publications page, Bio-X Stanford directory, Wikipedia, CAA Speakers bio, Substack profile, Reddit thread on faculty status, Reddit cogsci thread, CBS News affiliation via LinkedIn). Sources ignored: Approximately 8 sources were generic pages about cold emailing, research mentorship for high school students, or cold email templates with no specific information about Huberman. Confidence in identity: High. The LinkedIn anchor profile matches the Stanford faculty appointment, the educational history (UCSB, UC Berkeley, UC Davis, Stanford), the podcast affiliation, and the research focus confirmed across more than 15 independent sources. Data not found: Home address or direct email address (not publicly listed); specific information about Anders Lee's high school, grade, or prior neuroscience coursework (not provided by user); detail on whether Huberman currently accepts informal mentorship inquiries from high school students. Last updated: June 12, 2026. ---
THE PROCESS
01
Add their institution or lab to make sure we find the right person. The more specific, the better.
02
Papers, interviews, lab pages, public profiles, 150+ sources in under 30 seconds. We map how they think, what they value, and what actually moves them.
03
Not a template. A letter calibrated to one specific human being: their psychology, their work, and the most genuine connection between you and them.
The differentiator is the inference layer: connecting biographical facts to psychological implications. What does it mean when a professor has 40 publications but rarely mentions teaching in interviews? What does a career pivot from industry back to academia tell you about what they want from a student? Any tool can summarize a LinkedIn profile. Dossiér tells you what the facts mean for this specific email, to this specific person.
THE FOUNDER
Dossiér started with a simple observation: the most important variable in a cold email is the person reading it, and most students write to a stranger as if they already know them.
A skilled researcher can compile a dossier in 2-3 hours. A great analyst turns that into actionable psychology. Dossiér does both in under 30 seconds, using public OSINT and an AI reasoning layer built for the inference problem, not just the research problem.
Built for high school students and undergraduates reaching out to professors, researchers, and professionals who can open doors they have not yet been able to open themselves.
Leo Cao, Founder
GET IN TOUCH →GET STARTED
Create an account and run your first brief in under a minute.
SIGN UP FREE →